As described in the syllabus, I use your participation mark to determine the “-/null/+” part of your grade. Let me explain a little more explicitly how this works.
It’s simple. Suppose you successfully complete all the main assignments, but decide not to write a Project Proposal. Congratulations! You have qualified for a B. But what kind of a B?
If your class participation was: | You get a: | Which ROSI will show as: |
---|---|---|
Poor | B- | 72 |
Satisfactory | B | 75 |
Excellent | B+ | 78 |
Similarly, perhaps you were only able to complete the Git & Github, HTML & CSS, Javascript and Oral History. Oops! You’re going to get a C. Like your somewhat happier classmate, your final grade will be assigned thus:
If your class participation was: | You get a: | Which ROSI will show as: |
---|---|---|
Poor | C- | 62 |
Satisfactory | C | 65 |
Excellent | C+ | 68 |
But Note!
A+ is a special grade. Suppose you complete all the assignments satisfactorily, including the additional “A only” sections of the relevant assignments. Wow! You get an A, great. But… do you get an A+?
If your class participation was: | You get an: | Which ROSI will show as: |
---|---|---|
Poor | A- | 83 |
Satisfactory | A | 88 |
Excellent | DEPENDS | DEPENDS |
Even if your participation was excellent, you will only receive an A+ if your work was consistently excellent and occasionally brilliant. So, if you successfully complete all the assignments (great!), and also are a great class participant (thanks!), then I’ll look over all your work and make a value judgment about whether you deserve this rare and precious grade.
Final Note for 2018 – this year, there isn’t really a “D” grade. To pass the course you basically have to get a C. In rare cases I will consider lowering the grading criteria for the “Oral History” assignment to permit a student to scrape through the course.
Your participation mark is a combination of in-class and online participation.
But what makes for good class participation? You might want to start by reading How to discuss a book for history, which has lots of helpful suggestions. Really, please read it – it’s illuminating. But, meanwhile, here are some hints:
Our Slack workspace is also a great way to participate. Contribute to the class in Slack by asking good questions, helping out your classmates, and correcting any professorial errors from lecture!
If you can do all of these things consistently, you’re likely to earn a “+”. If you’re not sure how you’re doing, come ask me in a couple of weeks and I’ll give you some feedback.